Skip to main content

Author Topic: A thread for the cowardly whiny cunts.. come and get it

W
  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 49
  • Karma: +1/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?









  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1021
  • Karma: +15/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.

  • IP logged
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 01:55:39 PM by The Watchers Recurrence »

W
  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 49
  • Karma: +1/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.



Once again, answer the questions instead of using quotes that're out of context to deflect the topic. And for thousands time, we don't have a problem with Nick or his information, we have a problem with you.
And two can play this game.


  • IP logged

K

K

  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 51
  • Karma: +1/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.



Once again, answer the questions instead of using quotes that're out of context to deflect the topic. And for thousands time, we don't have a problem with Nick or his information, we have a problem with you.
And two can play this game.



This could just be the supreme retard take here, but if your disagreements are with a certain poster (in this case, The Watcher) then why not just engage him in discussion in the threads in which he posts by responding to his posts and addressing why you disagree with his assessments while providing your own reasoning and view?

 From the outsider perspective of someone one not in your private chat (probably most of the people on here?), it just looks like you pop up from no-where and make weirdly hostile and disingenuous posts towards the owner of a site that you don't appear to have much interaction with.

  • IP logged
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 03:59:31 PM by K »

G
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
helooooooooo broz!

Toast to you, my friendz NRG!
Beliv me or not
We az a group is very thankfulz for this message! !
Az you know and we now someone has leakedzzz us :)
Lastz time wherez I had a challendze to find you someone sentzz out information towards yourz towers...
The whole challendze wazz a joke and we didn't care about you itselfzz cuz it was done out of boredzooooommmm...
But we az a group have to be as bonded az pozzible since the journey is ling..
Thiz just helped out to sort the waters in the groupzz.
We already knew whoz waz this bad boy but there waz no proofs..
Soooo... We had to pushzzz some chess and make the questionzzz known...
If you want-- we, az we are thankful , can give you one nigger.
Justz azk. Very good slaver.


With scinzere and kindznezz,
Mister Hat a.k.a Goat Fukker
  • IP logged
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 04:14:46 PM by Goat Fukker »

  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 30
  • Karma: +4/-0
Way too much ego in this thread...
The most important lesson to be learned from esoterically that I've learned is to leave your ego behind. You all seemed to fail the most important lesson here which could have prevented all of this in the first place...
  • IP logged
"Nearly all men can handle adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."

"We buy things we don't need, with money we don't have, to impress people we don't like..."

W
  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 49
  • Karma: +1/-0

Quote
This could just be the supreme retard take here, but if your disagreements are with a certain poster (in this case, The Watcher) then why not just engage him in discussion in the threads in which he posts by responding to his posts and addressing why you disagree with his assessments while providing your own reasoning and view?

 From the outsider perspective of someone one not in your private chat (probably most of the people on here?), it just looks like you pop up from no-where and make weirdly hostile and disingenuous posts towards the owner of a site that you don't appear to have much interaction with.
we were originally going to resolve this privately, but unfortunately one of the members of our group got carried away, and before you know it this entire drama is pinned on the forum's front page, so here we are today.
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1021
  • Karma: +15/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.



Once again, answer the questions instead of using quotes that're out of context to deflect the topic. And for thousands time, we don't have a problem with Nick or his information, we have a problem with you.
And two can play this game.



The context is clearly 'Say one thing Nick is wrong about'. I don't see how you think it's not that.
You still refuse to say what the lot of you feel like was inaccurate. So I made that post with the screen capture and here you are saying its taken out of context when the context is very clear.

Your still trying to say that I hurt your feelings about "opinions" that differ from yours, which spawned this whole discussion. That still isn't the case but the people here wouldn't know that unless they read the history of a chat that spanned months. They have better things to do than that.

If you feel like what goes on here is largely someone else's "opinions" then why are you still here? You can get mere opinions anywhere on the internet.

Even if you do disagree with my "opinions" then why don't you address them in their respective threads? You have never done that once from what I can remember and you've barely contributed to what goes on here.

Also you can't take any responsibility for introducing me to this forum. The user who used to go by 'Montecristo' was the first one of you I met and the only one who had any role in that.
Interestingly enough the same user who used to go by 'Montecristo' (who is still here under another name) has occasionally expressed their "regret" for introducing me to this forum. His feelings are that since I've come here, I have lost the majority of the ability to think for myself. Do my posts here really reflect someone who fit that description?

I question why I even interact with the lot of you knowing I've bared the blunt of your """memes""" and difference in """opinions""" for far too long.

You and others related have even expressed feelings of low key distrust of Nick and his intentions here. Though that is another thing none of you will admit in the attempt to shift things away from yourselves.
  • IP logged
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 05:01:21 PM by The Watchers Recurrence »

  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 16
  • Karma: +1/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Way too much ego in this thread...
The most important lesson to be learned from esoterically that I've learned is to leave your ego behind. You all seemed to fail the most important lesson here which could have prevented all of this in the first place...

No need for me to say anything really, gonna be a repeat of what's been said basically. None of the less yeah there is way too much ego here, too much blinding from pride in general at that.

 To sum it up, it's good to have more then one source of information and criticism is ok but being an sjw isn't.(Not you but the other guy the watcher)

Also I did have some doubts with Nicks stuff but again criticism is a good thing cause it shows thinking without blindly accepting something. I do feel that the information posted on here is meant to make people question things and look if I'm not mistaken. I do admit to memeing on Nick a bit myself keep in mind in a chat that's supposed to be private not public, nothing too bad just the guy in wheel chair that we thought was Nick and was obviously not him for shits and giggles.(Not gonna be surprised if Nick laughed too after Watcher "showed him".)
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1021
  • Karma: +15/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Way too much ego in this thread...
The most important lesson to be learned from esoterically that I've learned is to leave your ego behind. You all seemed to fail the most important lesson here which could have prevented all of this in the first place...

No need for me to say anything really, gonna be a repeat of what's been said basically. None of the less yeah there is way too much ego here, too much blinding from pride in general at that.

 To sum it up, it's good to have more then one source of information and criticism is ok but being an sjw isn't.(Not you but the other guy the watcher)

Also I did have some doubts with Nicks stuff but again criticism is a good thing cause it shows thinking without blindly accepting something. I do feel that the information posted on here is meant to make people question things and look if I'm not mistaken. I do admit to memeing on Nick a bit myself keep in mind in a chat that's supposed to be private not public, nothing too bad just the guy in wheel chair that we thought was Nick and was obviously not him for shits and giggles.(Not gonna be surprised if Nick laughed too after Watcher "showed him".)

So you doubt things Nick has shared with us but you, just like the others, won't actually say what you doubted or questioned. All you'll do is say that there is something questionable or inaccurate here but you will never say why or what that is.

You doubt and criticize but where have you ever made a post questioning something here?
  • IP logged

e
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 132
  • Karma: +1/-0
Since we’re talking about ego, let’s address the TRUE mastery of the ego which is not in its eradication but in its application.

It’s not foolish to react to an ego that (frankly) dwarfs your own, that’s normal dick comparison and the smaller egos will always band against whatever they perceive a bigger threat. It’s expected behavior. It IS foolish to believe that The Watchers’ ego presented here is the extent of his persona, and more foolish to assume by your disagreement with his dogma that he does not or cannot see past his facade.

That’s like saying Trump is unintelligent because he presents a big ego. Moreover it’s like getting so angry at that big ego one fails to see what Trump works on, behind the facade.

I’ve had the pleasure of speaking with The Watchers about many things and I am impressed to see much substance not only behind his ego, but in his use of that ego. He applies his ego to higher knowledge because that is what his ego cares about, it may present pitfalls to him and others but boy does it fuel his quest like none other.

The Watchers does indeed contain substance behind his ego, I have seen it. I give the same benefit of doubt to his Accusers but the Accusers are not offering any intellectual substance that would warrant The Watchers put his ego away and roll up his sleeves. So why should he? The way I see it a pissant ego is the best response to a pissant accuser, it’s certainly triggered you all into exposure thus far.

If you cannot see past a Veil you don’t deserve to see what’s behind it, which is perhaps why you perceive a Veil in the first place.
  • IP logged
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 06:48:38 PM by ephemeron »
formerly zephyr

  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 16
  • Karma: +1/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Way too much ego in this thread...
The most important lesson to be learned from esoterically that I've learned is to leave your ego behind. You all seemed to fail the most important lesson here which could have prevented all of this in the first place...

No need for me to say anything really, gonna be a repeat of what's been said basically. None of the less yeah there is way too much ego here, too much blinding from pride in general at that.

 To sum it up, it's good to have more then one source of information and criticism is ok but being an sjw isn't.(Not you but the other guy the watcher)

Also I did have some doubts with Nicks stuff but again criticism is a good thing cause it shows thinking without blindly accepting something. I do feel that the information posted on here is meant to make people question things and look if I'm not mistaken. I do admit to memeing on Nick a bit myself keep in mind in a chat that's supposed to be private not public, nothing too bad just the guy in wheel chair that we thought was Nick and was obviously not him for shits and giggles.(Not gonna be surprised if Nick laughed too after Watcher "showed him".)

So you doubt things Nick has shared with us but you, just like the others, won't actually say what you doubted or questioned. All you'll do is say that there is something questionable or inaccurate here but you will never say why or what that is.

You doubt and criticize but where have you ever made a post questioning something here?

Your basically telling me that I can't criticise without posting it here the way your wording it. The problem is that you want Nick's validation on peoples opinions thus gratifying your ego. I do not need to post every bit of thing I disagree with on here either. Yes I should give examples but I do not feel like it right now.
  • IP logged

o
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: +2/-0
there's a difference between having a big ego and being passive-aggressive online with ironic comments because you dislike someone. the first one has to do with your identity and the self, while the second is more of an emotional, childish reaction that wastes everybody's time.
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1021
  • Karma: +15/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Way too much ego in this thread...
The most important lesson to be learned from esoterically that I've learned is to leave your ego behind. You all seemed to fail the most important lesson here which could have prevented all of this in the first place...

No need for me to say anything really, gonna be a repeat of what's been said basically. None of the less yeah there is way too much ego here, too much blinding from pride in general at that.

 To sum it up, it's good to have more then one source of information and criticism is ok but being an sjw isn't.(Not you but the other guy the watcher)

Also I did have some doubts with Nicks stuff but again criticism is a good thing cause it shows thinking without blindly accepting something. I do feel that the information posted on here is meant to make people question things and look if I'm not mistaken. I do admit to memeing on Nick a bit myself keep in mind in a chat that's supposed to be private not public, nothing too bad just the guy in wheel chair that we thought was Nick and was obviously not him for shits and giggles.(Not gonna be surprised if Nick laughed too after Watcher "showed him".)

So you doubt things Nick has shared with us but you, just like the others, won't actually say what you doubted or questioned. All you'll do is say that there is something questionable or inaccurate here but you will never say why or what that is.

You doubt and criticize but where have you ever made a post questioning something here?

Your basically telling me that I can't criticise without posting it here the way your wording it. The problem is that you want Nick's validation on peoples opinions thus gratifying your ego. I do not need to post every bit of thing I disagree with on here either. Yes I should give examples but I do not feel like it right now.

If you come here and say that you find some information here worth doubt and questionable, then you should say what that information is.
If you won't post what you feel is questionable and worth doubt then why even comment on it here to begin with?

You do realize that Nick isn't the only person who frequently contributes things of substance to the forum, right? I've read many insightful and revealing posts made by other (mainly but not limited to the main posters) people here.

You may genuinely not feel like posting examples, but you do see how 'convenient' that is to those eating their corns to this interesting display?
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 949
  • Karma: +18/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not sure if I am following your train of thought.
I had something else in mind.
My point was that there might be other people who know something of use. And that limiting yourself to a single source of information, is limiting.
Also that there other people who might not want to learn, so there is not much point in trying to teach them.
So eventually they will come to their senses, since the point is to actually live in the world and learn.
But, there is a certain someone who is very anal about it(not you). And for the sole reason that no one else even tried to disprove him, I did. Just because I could. And thus here we are now.

Than i wasnt spesking to you, though i know you partake in snake talk outside of here
  • IP logged

 
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk