Skip to main content

Author Topic: A thread for the cowardly whiny cunts.. come and get it

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not sure if I am following your train of thought.
I had something else in mind.
My point was that there might be other people who know something of use. And that limiting yourself to a single source of information, is limiting.
Also that there other people who might not want to learn, so there is not much point in trying to teach them.
So eventually they will come to their senses, since the point is to actually live in the world and learn.
But, there is a certain someone who is very anal about it(not you). And for the sole reason that no one else even tried to disprove him, I did. Just because I could. And thus here we are now.
you should say who that "certain someone" is instead of wasting everyone's time

Its 5 or 6 someones and since you are one you know what i speak of. You choose to waste your time here, andi agree for you and your ilk you can gain nothing here
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

I understand how grass is green Ironclad dubious Dimensions when he was here and the Watchers could you listen jealousy from other people do to their impressive growth and Improvement in their half a decade or so here, but you acting like he's the problem when in reality you're the ones Turning Away information you can't refute because you either like the intellectual capability or because it is irrefutable or both

Are you not entertained!?
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

But they were retards and niggers  I'm fully aware of this. Should I have called them apricots and Lamborghinis because they're not they were retards and niggers
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

But they were retards and niggers  I'm fully aware of this. Should I have called them apricots and Lamborghinis because they're not they were retards and niggers
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

They're deflecting like the fatherless mentally ill cowards that they are it was always an issue of veracity that was the root of the issue because if they accepted what I represent to be correct and there's no problem in the first place.

They're resorting to name-calling and tone policing because they have no argument it's the mark of an inferior mind
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
Bear heart....lmfao my sides... hes a care bear, thats too cute to pity..

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.



Once again, answer the questions instead of using quotes that're out of context to deflect the topic. And for thousands time, we don't have a problem with Nick or his information, we have a problem with you.
And two can play this game.



Bernie sanders... how the fuck was i wring about beach house bernie
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.



You're literally just inventing s*** show me where I ever said communism is good although Cuba I did have nice things to say about although I never said they were our friend. I correctly pointed out they were a former Ally until Castro went rogue after we installed him which is of course well-documented
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Okay then, let us continue this soap opera.

Its the watchers. He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him.
The same guy who has no other arguments besides "because nrg said so", which is funny since he likes to assume a lot.
And thus now the mastermind behind this showdown, since apparently we did not manage to solve this argument by logic.

Are you not entertained!?

I've presented information to you and few others in a dogmatic way (and I have my reasons for that) in other places but if you've read any of my posts here "because nrg said so" isn't an actual argument made by me at all. Those kind of arguments don't hold well here.

I value the information shared here a great deal and I've expressed (much to the annoyance of others like you and related) that its 'the truth' but I admit now that I shouldn't have done that for a number of reasons.
You and others have claimed the information shared here is anything from "useless" to "cryptic". When I have expressed thoughts contrary to this, you all get mad and claim I'm kissing ass or something else just as ridiculous.

You will claim all these insults are "taken out of context" and are just straight "memes" but I'd hardly say that is the case.

Of course, there are also the handful of moments where I've asked you to clarify on what the 'issue' is hear to which you make wise crack remarks like "Now you gotta find it yourself, its about the journey" and avoid just plainly stating what the issue is.
Even those remarks are poking fun at the Socratic method utilized here and other things we discuss, specifically to the Key#1 thread which you and others feel is a big "waste of time".
If you ask others who are in a similar boat, they have stopped saying that my insistence on the accuracy of the information here (and the lack of accuracy of information from other places) isn't the issue. Instead you will feign ignorance and act like 'we were all just joking and your taking our comments out of context'.

You should also be more clear than: "He doesn't like when other kids have fun elsewhere without him."
What does that even mean?

Again, when asked 'what' the apparent 'issue' is, you will never be straight and claim that you made the meme (pictures included) of 'mastah nrg' to help me 'fix my ego'.

You and a few others who think there is inaccurate information on here still refuse to post what is apparently inaccurate for what ever reason. Still, you don't post the apparent inaccurate information but what you will post is disingenuous comments about how you aren't capable of understanding the 'big brain' stuff that we discuss here.

It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality.
Perhaps you should've included all those times you've mocked and called others "retards" and "niggers", before ending the discussion with "go read nrg LOL" simply because they hold a contrary opinion than yours in your secret screenshots; or even better, how you defended the Chinese pedophile ring simply based on one of Nicks quote telling us China isn't the boogyman that the media has portrayed it to be.
The lack of self-awareness and projection here is just simply astounding.  I expected better from you.

You spent the better part of an hour last night trying to shift things from you and others to me. 'I'm not the issue, infact, its you and your insecurities'.
You've even gone as far as to say that I am insecure about my racial background and that I lack a father figure enough to have turned Nick into one. Which to you all, would explain my "dick riding".

There's no point in debating with you since you've made very clear that you will never clearly state the actual cause of all this.

This all started when I insisted many times that Nick hasn't shared wrong or inaccurate information with us to which you all started making memes about me sucking up to him, him being 'the mastah' and even going to the lengths of finding the Facebook account previously associated to him and make memes out of the pictures taken from there.

From there the first 'wave' of disingenuous posts and comments made in the old forum spawned where a certain person (who I don't even know if they have an account here) made a thread asking for people to post pictures of their faces.
You can ask for 'proof' but I didn't archive any of that. You can claim that never happened but the main members here remember that very vividly, at least I'm willing to bet.

After that you all insisted I was a rat and had informed Nick of your disrespectful probing (I did not, not until it was already known, a thread had been made and it got needlessly 'big') and I had said many times to stop but none of you did. You will say this was just 'for the memez' and that there was no ulterior motive and while that may be the case, it caused needless conflict all because you just had to see what Nick apparently looked like, and from the images with the associated account you all think his apparent size discredits the information shared here.

Things only settled down for a brief period after that. Someone posted some information form 'Bearheart' in another chat we discuss things and I pointed out the inaccuracy of the information presented but it was more than just "nrg didn't say this".
This spawned the 'second wave' of disingenuous posts here which is what we are witnessing now.

You can act like your trying to help me by insulting me and memeing Nick's previously associated Facebook images all you want, but that isn't the case at all.

There's no high white horse for you and the others to ride on here.

Kek, where do I even start.
"Pointing out inaccuracies"? The way you acted is more like foul mouthed member of Jehovah witness prejudiced against the blacks and the disabled, except that at least a Jehovah's witness member has a larger vocabulary and more imaginative in their insults and retorts.
And don't you dodge the responsibilities now, because we both know full well hadn't you gone around calling people names for holding opinions contrary to what's posted on the forum, none of this drama would've started in the first place. In fact, the whole "master" meme wasn't spawned out of the collective distrust of Nick, but rather, the collective disgust of your attitude mixed in with the desire for you to become at least semi-aware of your childish behaviors (which unfortunately had failed).
Furthermore, what I find most amusing and irritated by is your belief that we are some how "secretly conspiring against Nick", and "sucks the dick of Bearheart", all because we disagreed with your stance on the latter individual and believes there's still some practical information that can be learned from his material? All the while we spent month digging through the clear net and compiling a series of audios recommended by Nick, watched the films and medias recommended by him, and even started a Russian learning club as inspired by his statement that knowing multiple languages is a sign of high intelligence? So I ask you (if your logic faculty has not short circuited), tell me exactly where does this proves your accusation that we think this forum is filled with disinformation, and "worships" bearheart and only uses his material, especially considering the ones you are accusing of foul play were also the ones who introduced you to this forum in the first place? Or will you simply deflect further and keeps on throwing baseless accusations?

Why are you even here if all we deal in is "opinions"? What good is that?

Because you and others refuse to say it, here are your "baseless accusations". You still have to quote that he actually said any of these things, which you should be able to do given (at least) a little over half his posts are archived and made available to everyone.



Once again, answer the questions instead of using quotes that're out of context to deflect the topic. And for thousands time, we don't have a problem with Nick or his information, we have a problem with you.
And two can play this game.



So you honestly think China is a good proxy for the United States and how minorities were performed in a nationalist communist culture as opposed to a mixed capitalist mixed race culture man you know nothing about sociology oor economics..
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Way too much ego in this thread...
The most important lesson to be learned from esoterically that I've learned is to leave your ego behind. You all seemed to fail the most important lesson here which could have
prevented all of this in the first place...

No need for me to say anything really, gonna be a repeat of what's been said basically. None of the less yeah there is way too much ego here, too much blinding from pride in general at that.

 To sum it up, it's good to have more then one source of information and criticism is ok but being an sjw isn't.(Not you but the other guy the watcher)

Also I did have some doubts with Nicks stuff but again criticism is a good thing cause it shows thinking without blindly accepting something. I do feel that the information posted on here is meant to make people question things and look if I'm not mistaken. I do admit to memeing on Nick a bit myself keep in mind in a chat that's supposed to be private not public, nothing too bad just the guy in wheel chair that we thought was Nick and was obviously not him for shits and giggles.(Not gonna be surprised if Nick laughed too after Watcher "showed him".)

I never heard about the wheel chair thing... that is  funny though
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Since we’re talking about ego, let’s address the TRUE mastery of the ego which is not in its eradication but in its application.

It’s not foolish to react to an ego that (frankly) dwarfs your own, that’s normal dick comparison and the smaller egos will always band against whatever they perceive a bigger threat. It’s expected behavior. It IS foolish to believe that The Watchers’ ego presented here is the extent of his persona, and more foolish to assume by your disagreement with his dogma that he does not or cannot see past his facade.

That’s like saying Trump is unintelligent because he presents a big ego. Moreover it’s like getting so angry at that big ego one fails to see what Trump works on, behind the facade.

I’ve had the pleasure of speaking with The Watchers about many things and I am impressed to see much substance not only behind his ego, but in his use of that ego. He applies his ego to higher knowledge because that is what his ego cares about, it may present pitfalls to him and others but boy does it fuel his quest like none other.

The Watchers does indeed contain substance behind his ego, I have seen it. I give the same benefit of doubt to his Accusers but the Accusers are not offering any intellectual substance that would warrant The Watchers put his ego away and roll up his sleeves. So why should he? The way I see it a pissant ego is the best response to a pissant accuser, it’s certainly triggered you all into exposure thus far.

If you cannot see past a Veil you don’t deserve to see what’s behind it, which is perhaps why you perceive a Veil in the first place.

You present is unintelligent because everything you say is actual b******* and garbage not because you have an ego your ego just proves that you're too mentally immature to learn
  • IP logged

o
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 203
  • Karma: +2/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not sure if I am following your train of thought.
I had something else in mind.
My point was that there might be other people who know something of use. And that limiting yourself to a single source of information, is limiting.
Also that there other people who might not want to learn, so there is not much point in trying to teach them.
So eventually they will come to their senses, since the point is to actually live in the world and learn.
But, there is a certain someone who is very anal about it(not you). And for the sole reason that no one else even tried to disprove him, I did. Just because I could. And thus here we are now.
you should say who that "certain someone" is instead of wasting everyone's time

Its 5 or 6 someones and since you are one you know what i speak of. You choose to waste your time here, andi agree for you and your ilk you can gain nothing here
me and my ilk? I think you're confused about my post. I was just pointing out how these whiny indirect comments made by some users were not contributing to anything productive. I don't know any of these users and I don't think this site is a waste of time, in fact I have personally gained a lot from it, which is precisely why I don't like when others inject unnecessary drama.
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +19/-0
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not sure if I am following your train of thought.
I had something else in mind.
My point was that there might be other people who know something of use. And that limiting yourself to a single source of information, is limiting.
Also that there other people who might not want to learn, so there is not much point in trying to teach them.
So eventually they will come to their senses, since the point is to actually live in the world and learn.
But, there is a certain someone who is very anal about it(not you). And for the sole reason that no one else even tried to disprove him, I did. Just because I could. And thus here we are now.
you should say who that "certain someone" is instead of wasting everyone's time

Its 5 or 6 someones and since you are one you know what i speak of. You choose to waste your time here, andi agree for you and your ilk you can gain nothing here
me and my ilk? I think you're confused about my post. I was just pointing out how these whiny indirect comments made by some users were not contributing to anything productive. I don't know any of these users and I don't think this site is a waste of time, in fact I have personally gained a lot from it, which is precisely why I don't like when others inject unnecessary drama.

 actually you're correct I'm sorry I'm viewing it on my mobile and the formatting had me thinking you were William consider this a full retraction and apology
  • IP logged

W
  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 49
  • Karma: +1/-0

Quote

The context is clearly 'Say one thing Nick is wrong about'. I don't see how you think it's not that.
You still refuse to say what the lot of you feel like was inaccurate. So I made that post with the screen capture and here you are saying its taken out of context when the context is very clear.

Your still trying to say that I hurt your feelings about "opinions" that differ from yours, which spawned this whole discussion. That still isn't the case but the people here wouldn't know that unless they read the history of a chat that spanned months. They have better things to do than that.

If you feel like what goes on here is largely someone else's "opinions" then why are you still here? You can get mere opinions anywhere on the internet.

Even if you do disagree with my "opinions" then why don't you address them in their respective threads? You have never done that once from what I can remember and you've barely contributed to what goes on here.

Also you can't take any responsibility for introducing me to this forum. The user who used to go by 'Montecristo' was the first one of you I met and the only one who had any role in that.
Interestingly enough the same user who used to go by 'Montecristo' (who is still here under another name) has occasionally expressed their "regret" for introducing me to this forum. His feelings are that since I've come here, I have lost the majority of the ability to think for myself. Do my posts here really reflect someone who fit that description?

I question why I even interact with the lot of you knowing I've bared the blunt of your """memes""" and difference in """opinions""" for far too long.

You and others related have even expressed feelings of low key distrust of Nick and his intentions here. Though that is another thing none of you will admit in the attempt to shift things away from yourselves.

No Watcher, the context is you believing Nick to be an "infallible keeper of ancient knowledge" who can "speak no wrong", and you by believing him makes your opinion likewise infallible, and those who disagree with you "retarded niggers", for disagreeing with you is somehow an act of denying "the truth". And since you yourself is infallible by virtue of your affiliation with an infallible master, you find little need to back up your arguments besides debased insults and the typical "read Nrg" (an action which I believe is called being an intellectual hack). Hence, my actions were more of a jab at your inflated sense of ego and intellectual "invulnerability", to tell you "yes you can be wrong, dip-shit", but too bad you failed to properly interpret the message.

Now on the topic of trust, as I've explained previously, the members of the group don't have a problem with Nick, and in fact most of group projects--be it the April challenge, watching twin peaks, learning new languages--were inspired by Nick's post on this forum. Further, an detail you've forgot to add is the members who express distrusts towards Nick have expressed distrust towards the likes of Bearheart, and on occasions even mocked me for dabbling in the conspiracy field. So us having trust issues with him? Not even the slightest. Or as Nick would say, you judge a tree by its fruits.

As for your grievance with the threads, I want to remind you this is not an issue regarding informations, who's right or wrong, but of the way you act, of how you stubbornly hide behind the words and name of Nick whenever you are questioned or challenged. Additionally, since this is largely a private matter, it only made since to resolve this privately and spare the public of this drama; and even if I wanted to I did not have the means to do so, for prior to this forum's abrupt closing and reopening my emails were blacklisted as spam on this site for reasons unknown, which prevented me from contributing to the discussions herein. But even so I still complied and shared a great deal of materials with you privately, so I find it greatly insulting that you even dared to use "contributions" as evidence of my "insincerity".

Lastly, a thing you seem to fail to grasp is that the group don't hate you for holding "different opinions", but what we dislike is your laziness and unwillingness to even have a proper debate on said disagreements. You could do well with a few lessons in reading comprehension.
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1310
  • Karma: +26/-2
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Quote

The context is clearly 'Say one thing Nick is wrong about'. I don't see how you think it's not that.
You still refuse to say what the lot of you feel like was inaccurate. So I made that post with the screen capture and here you are saying its taken out of context when the context is very clear.

Your still trying to say that I hurt your feelings about "opinions" that differ from yours, which spawned this whole discussion. That still isn't the case but the people here wouldn't know that unless they read the history of a chat that spanned months. They have better things to do than that.

If you feel like what goes on here is largely someone else's "opinions" then why are you still here? You can get mere opinions anywhere on the internet.

Even if you do disagree with my "opinions" then why don't you address them in their respective threads? You have never done that once from what I can remember and you've barely contributed to what goes on here.

Also you can't take any responsibility for introducing me to this forum. The user who used to go by 'Montecristo' was the first one of you I met and the only one who had any role in that.
Interestingly enough the same user who used to go by 'Montecristo' (who is still here under another name) has occasionally expressed their "regret" for introducing me to this forum. His feelings are that since I've come here, I have lost the majority of the ability to think for myself. Do my posts here really reflect someone who fit that description?

I question why I even interact with the lot of you knowing I've bared the blunt of your """memes""" and difference in """opinions""" for far too long.

You and others related have even expressed feelings of low key distrust of Nick and his intentions here. Though that is another thing none of you will admit in the attempt to shift things away from yourselves.

No Watcher, the context is you believing Nick to be an "infallible keeper of ancient knowledge" who can "speak no wrong", and you by believing him makes your opinion likewise infallible, and those who disagree with you "retarded niggers", for disagreeing with you is somehow an act of denying "the truth". And since you yourself is infallible by virtue of your affiliation with an infallible master, you find little need to back up your arguments besides debased insults and the typical "read Nrg" (an action which I believe is called being an intellectual hack). Hence, my actions were more of a jab at your inflated sense of ego and intellectual "invulnerability", to tell you "yes you can be wrong, dip-shit", but too bad you failed to properly interpret the message.

Now on the topic of trust, as I've explained previously, the members of the group don't have a problem with Nick, and in fact most of group projects--be it the April challenge, watching twin peaks, learning new languages--were inspired by Nick's post on this forum. Further, an detail you've forgot to add is the members who express distrusts towards Nick have expressed distrust towards the likes of Bearheart, and on occasions even mocked me for dabbling in the conspiracy field. So us having trust issues with him? Not even the slightest. Or as Nick would say, you judge a tree by its fruits.

As for your grievance with the threads, I want to remind you this is not an issue regarding informations, who's right or wrong, but of the way you act, of how you stubbornly hide behind the words and name of Nick whenever you are questioned or challenged. Additionally, since this is largely a private matter, it only made since to resolve this privately and spare the public of this drama; and even if I wanted to I did not have the means to do so, for prior to this forum's abrupt closing and reopening my emails were blacklisted as spam on this site for reasons unknown, which prevented me from contributing to the discussions herein. But even so I still complied and shared a great deal of materials with you privately, so I find it greatly insulting that you even dared to use "contributions" as evidence of my "insincerity".

Lastly, a thing you seem to fail to grasp is that the group don't hate you for holding "different opinions", but what we dislike is your laziness and unwillingness to even have a proper debate on said disagreements. You could do well with a few lessons in reading comprehension.

I've already said the information I've presented to you all in other places was done in a dogmatic way. If you've read any of my posts here or on the old forum, you can clearly see my arguments aren't "Nrg said so".
To you lot, anything I say is either "Nrg said so" or "Crowley said so", which you also express a complete lack of understanding and something short of an extreme dislike of the information Crowley shared with the world.
Where did the majority of your Crowley skepticism come from? Didn't 'Bearheart' speak vehemently against him?

Again, if you believe the majority of what is discussed here are just mere "opinions" then you should probably find somewhere else to hang around.

Again, if I say that the information Nick has shared with us and guided us to is extremely truthful and you say it isn't, then what about what he has shared isn't?
This issue is entirely a matter of the veracity of the information shared here and not someones feelings over name calling on the internet.

You even express your 'skepticism' of the information shared here by repeatedly calling it "opinions". So again, what about these "opinions" is inaccurate or incorrect?
Oh, but I guess you will continue to not respond to those questions because as you said: "It's not an issue of veracity as you claim, its an issue of insecurity and personality."

And who were the ones who made all this public on the forum to begin with? Who made the original disingenuous posts and threads in the old forum about this? Who made the new ones that revealed there was an issue to begin with?
  • IP logged
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 08:50:20 PM by The Watchers Recurrence »

 
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk