I ran into this guy earlier this year.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
Claimed to be Tony Blairs son. nothing seems to have panned out, except for USA being sprayed with Vitamin d booster.
Weird thing about this thread, it is no longer in my bookmarks. Nor in my history. I can not find it.
There were a lot of spoopy (((insider))) threads on /pol/ during the heydey of Corona General threads. Posts of note from your image:
* "There's a cycle that we know with 100% certainty in which humanity is decimated, it happens in between every 11-13 thousand years"
* "It's about globalization, the system can no longer sustain anybody over the age of 55 that hasn't got a pot of gold to sit on. They can't have people taking without giving ... it will be a yearly event until it is given a helping hand to mutate."
* "Being the people that they need to survive in order for the USERY to continue. The only blood type of note is O-negative."
* "Reality isn't exactly what you think it is... and what you don't know is that there's people on your side. At the very top. Even above the top."
Honestly I don't know what to think. I don't have a problem with the Georgia Guidestones idea of population reduction and living in harmony with the planet, but I would prefer it be done in a humane way. I just wish the elites were 'good' instead of 'evil'.
In what way is the population of earth in disharmony with the planet
As someone that has studied growth economics and economic development I'm gonna throw my hat into the ring here, but I'll keep it brief:
The idea that we are anywhere near overpopulated on this planet is complete bullshit, disproven at least in the modern era but as far back as the back and forth between david ricardo and thomas malthus. Arguments made with a premise of overpopulation as a thing are often refered to as malthusian. Here is why the argument is bogus:
without exception this far, it seems that as gdp per capita increases (economic growth) the rate of population growth decreases. Simply put as standard of living rises, and kids gain higher likelihood of not dying in the early years from illness, and as technological innovation accrues, adults for various reasons seem to have fewer kids (e.g. children become less a component of parental retirement plans, therefore people have fewer kids when economic growth occurs and a country undergoes development).
the world bank, u.n., imf, (pozzed though they may be) all keep population and gdp per capita data for most all countries going back to bretton-woods. if anyone would like to run their own correlation tests to see the inverse relationship between gdp growth and population growth, to keep the data small they can simply take say germany, U.S., canada, Britain, Australia, Japan and any other major player that was around for wwii. if one still isn't convinced, run the numbers for additional countries.
In closing, I have yet to see one convincing argument able to persuade me that population growth is an inevitable problem since having become familiar with the data.