Skip to main content

Author Topic: I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...

i

iknownothing

I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
OP: May 04, 2020, 04:36:21 AM


But it needs adressing none the less. How accurate do you think the above is?

It's even worse now with the current generation of "onlyfan women" selling nudes of themselves and making thousands per week. I see they (women) are trying to make it so "sexworkers" don't have to pay taxes  ::) too. Remember #thotaudit? Men and other women reporting women who actively pursue tax avoidance is somehow "trolling them". You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Any criticism of a woman is branded "trolling" by the media, or msyognistic yet it's opposite; misandry doesn't appear to exist. I saw a news article recently but I think it was old, that there weren't enough fat women in tv shows. I mean come on actual promotion of unhealthy bodies as both desirable to men (eugh) and how other women should actually be living? What's wrong with the world?

Thousands of men die for women in wars and work where the more dangerous jobs are and women still think they suffer more, or in the case of workforce, they demand equal rights and equal pay but they don't do equal work:



And still...


  • IP logged
« Last Edit: May 04, 2020, 04:41:02 AM by iknownothing »

M
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 154
  • Karma: +1/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#1: May 04, 2020, 05:00:27 AM
It is no secret that women have become trash, the more you interact with them now in the modern times, the more you realize this is true. It was a mistake to given women the vote, lol. This - cant handle me at worst dont deserve me at best mindset has poisioned the majority of western womens minds, truly despicable. There is not even a point in relationships anymore. It's mostly used up women these days available. Young girls (((influenced))) to start fucking at a young age and (((explore their sexuality))) with multiple partners. Got told by girls a few days ago they're scared of me just because I wake up extra early, do cold showers, not indulge into the vices and have a moral code.. There was some study that DNA of every previous partner stays inside and the child will have some of that DNA. Disgusting. The promotion of ugly landwhales just for ''inclusivity'' is fucked up and just wrong.
  • IP logged

  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • I Object.
Re: I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#2: May 04, 2020, 12:54:12 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It is no secret that women have become trash, the more you interact with them now in the modern times, the more you realize this is true. It was a mistake to given women the vote, lol. This - cant handle me at worst dont deserve me at best mindset has poisioned the majority of western womens minds, truly despicable. There is not even a point in relationships anymore. It's mostly used up women these days available. Young girls (((influenced))) to start fucking at a young age and (((explore their sexuality))) with multiple partners. Got told by girls a few days ago they're scared of me just because I wake up extra early, do cold showers, not indulge into the vices and have a moral code.. There was some study that DNA of every previous partner stays inside and the child will have some of that DNA. Disgusting. The promotion of ugly landwhales just for ''inclusivity'' is fucked up and just wrong.

Agreed. But it's at least a positive thing how amazingly moldable the right woman can be when she is with the right man. She just needs to cut the ties that bind her mind. I've seen wives completely change their political views when they finally experience the comfort that comes with male protection and concern.
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • Posts: 332
  • Karma: +11/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#3: May 04, 2020, 01:45:24 PM
If anything it's actually understating the case. Women got the vote but they didn't have to sacrifice to get it like men did. When online owing Mills got the vote that was in exchange for the draft and conscription to the fire brigade women were just given the vote with no exchange so that was the very beginning of their entitlement mentality as a whole.

In addition to that when women went into the workforce the amount of Labor doubled their for the price of Labor went down by over half. So instead of Mom's paycheck being additional income it became necessary to maintain the family standard of living.

Women suffrage was easily the most destructive thing to Western civilization
  • IP logged

D
  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: +3/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#4: May 04, 2020, 02:21:14 PM
“Here are young women with more opportunities, more liberties than almost any women in history and at that moment we tell them they’re short-changed silenced victims of a patriarchy? It’s defeatist and demoralising.”
― Christina Hoff Sommers


“Victimhood gives us great moral superiority and entitles us to unquestioning sympathy while exempting us from examining any single one of our actions. A victim is utterly devoid of responsibility or blame. This of course leaves us vulnerable as we will carry on engaging in precisely the behaviour which provoked an unacceptable response.”
― Belinda Brown


The feminism of equality, of toughness, of anti-discrimination, has been overwhelmed by one of victimhood and demands for special treatment....At a certain point, when we demand an equal ratio of men to women in certain fields, what we’re criticizing is not “the system,” but the choices that women themselves are making.....let’s keep our eye on the question of equal opportunity and stop obsessing about equal outcomes, lest we find ourselves trying to cure society, not of sexism, but of free choice.”
― Elizabeth Wasserman

Men and boys are constantly portrayed as predatory, sexist, their sense of humour is vilified and their behaviour is regarded as unacceptable. Factor in the constant diet we are fed of men as perpetrators of rape, murder and domestic violence. Boys must wonder whether they will ever be able to do anything right. This must make it painfully difficult for young men and women to build up relations based on honesty, love and trust.”
― Belinda Brown

“Feminists believe that women should be protected from certain aspects of public life, including speech..... Feminists do not want to engage in aspects of life they disagree with. Instead, they want to silence what they don’t like through censorship and criminalisation. Feminists believe that women need protection from words.
Finally, contemporary feminists do not believe that women are independent, free-thinking individuals. Feminists promote a cliquey, sisterhood mentality, but not through a collective and positive sharing of ideas. They’re the kind of group you’d encounter at school who would shun you if you weren’t wearing the right kind of hairband. Today’s feminism is opposed to criticism and nuance, refusing to allow women to form their own opinions or challenge preconceived ideas.”
― Ella Whelan

When feminists create “safe spaces” for adult women...I seriously question why any woman would identify as a feminist. Feminists literally treat adult women like three year olds. How does this empower you to make smart choices about your life? How does this embolden you to go after what you want?....If feminists followed the dictionary, they wouldn’t fear #WomenAgainstFeminism and work so desperately to exclude them from the conversation about gender and equality. They would engage in debate and offer evidence....But they don’t. They file false reports, claim abuse and harassment where none took place and ultimately, expose the heart of fascist, intolerant, hateful darkness at the core of feminism.”
― Janet Bloomfield

“The feminist movement as we have come to know it in recent decades is fundamentally a "con."...As it is considered treasonous to criticise a sister feminist, no standards of accuracy or honesty are ever enforced. Hyperbole and deceit thus become the formula for success, "peer review" playing no role in reining in misinformation. Any would-be feminist who raises scholarly objections to the rampant misinformation is branded an 'enemy of women' and is drummed out of the movement.”
― Robert Sheaffer

One of the reasons for the failure of feminism to dislodge deeply held perceptions of male and female behaviour was its insistence that women were victims, and men powerful patriarchs, which made a travesty of ordinary people's experience of the mutual interdependence of men and women.
-Rosaline Coward

No man is as anti-feminist as a really feminine woman.
-Frank O'Connor

“It [feminism] is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands.”
― G.K. Chesterton
  • IP logged

i

iknownothing

I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#5: May 04, 2020, 02:46:56 PM
Another point I forgot to mention is homelessness.

I worked briefly with a homeless charity in my city where it's quite rife (along with not-homeless men who own houses pretending to be homeless and taking 500 quid a day in change but that's another story). Right at the time of this the BBC did a documentary on the homeless. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Do note the title of this documentary.

- There were zero homeless women on the street in my city at the time.
- The BBC only featured homeless women and their struggles despite 70% of homeless being men not women.
- Some of the women interviewed are supposedly homeless but featured designer sunglasses, jewelry etc.

Another article on the homeless this time in manchester. Again only features women. Women with designer sunglasses, jewelry, make up etc. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The stats and statistics also show that the majority of men are homeless, many of these are ex-military ie gone to Iraq, got PTSD, come home and if their wives haven't already cheated on them and made them homeless already, can't cope and become homeless. Imagine going to fight for your country, getting shot at, seeing some shit, coming back to find you aren't of use anymore to your wife / gf / kids and you get abandonded, minus any of your networth, and have to live on the streets?

It gets worse because if you remember that Hellmer group, they basically said if you are destitute enough to be homeless you deserve being harvested by their team / for their goals.

Don't even get me started on domestic violence against men. This article from Xojane pretty much sums up the attitude towards that. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

"Men's Domestic Violence Shelters Are a Misuse of Nonprofit Funding"

including snippets like

- The nine-bed facility diverts money from resources that could have helped more women.

- Men's Rights Advocates haven't adequately credited feminists for bringing awareness to the problem of domestic violence.

- A shelter for men might not adequately reinforce the concept that toxic masculinity "is always a part of domestic violence".


And finally, anyone remember the french riots? This about sums up the situation.

  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • Posts: 332
  • Karma: +11/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#6: May 04, 2020, 07:27:58 PM
The divorce court , alimony, child support scam, mens complete absence of reproductive rights and the pharmaceutical assault on testosterone
  • IP logged

  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 117
  • Karma: +5/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#7: May 05, 2020, 03:56:54 AM
Degrade and debase the family unit.  Divide and conquer.  The mind control is strong, when it's projected through emotional filters.  It's unfortunate, that to talk about it in an objective way, we have to put everyone in the same box.  But, that is the objective and step by step process - and people are social animals that bond through similar behaviour.  Oh - how the ones who control, know their flock. 
  • IP logged

  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 70
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • I Object.
Re: I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#8: May 05, 2020, 04:22:20 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Degrade and debase the family unit.  Divide and conquer.  The mind control is strong, when it's projected through emotional filters.  It's unfortunate, that to talk about it in an objective way, we have to put everyone in the same box.  But, that is the objective and step by step process - and people are social animals that bond through similar behaviour.  Oh - how the ones who control, know their flock. 

Very well said
  • IP logged

  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 117
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#9: May 05, 2020, 05:02:06 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Degrade and debase the family unit.  Divide and conquer.  The mind control is strong, when it's projected through emotional filters.  It's unfortunate, that to talk about it in an objective way, we have to put everyone in the same box.  But, that is the objective and step by step process - and people are social animals that bond through similar behaviour.  Oh - how the ones who control, know their flock. 

Very well said

Thanks.  It's horrible to watch it happening though.  It seemed to kick into higher gear in the seventies... when they took the gold standard away from money.  It all went downhill from there.   
  • IP logged

D
  • **
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#10: May 05, 2020, 08:54:15 AM
Quote
I get why marxism seems appealing, it caters to the 20 year old in all of us that wants a cooperative utopia, but the truth is marxism has ALWAYS lead to mass murder and oppression. China under Mao, Stalin, Lenin, shit trotsky's bolshevik revolution and the 60,000,000 dead that NO ONE ever discusses. Its literally ALL BAD.

One of the main reasons is with marxism comes Identity politics. See originally they tried pitting working class against the rich and that worked 70 years ago. They tried like hell to gain traction with it in america, but instead we got labor unions, and 1960's counter culture, so in the 70's LBJ famously said "Ill have Ni****s voting democrat for the next 100 years" with social entitlements. \

So racial identity was the first game played. Weird thing though, prior to LBJs "welfare reform" black families has a single parent rate of about 20% which after his policies escalated to the 70%+ it stands at today.

Than when black americans were under toe, they moved on to homosexuals, and we got the gay rights movements of the 90s.

After that they realized they were out of "oppressed people" so they started "3rd wave feminism" which unlike the first 2 waves, which were both effective and important, demanded not equity but privilege.

Thats why trans people who are 0.002 percent of the world population were cast in the spotlight the past few years, they are the next fabricated victim class on deck.

Decade by decade new groups are trotted out,conditions for all DECLINE, we move further from equity and resentment builds on all sides. Which invariably leads to violent revolution.

Once you become violent you are playing their game and they know how to deal with you.

Who is "they" : The frankfurt group, the standford research institute,tavistock, and most of the"think thanks" that get geopolitical funding.

Quote
Until the middle 1980's homosexuality was correctly classified as a mental disorder in the DSM(psychologists bible) A Gay Lobby group wanted it "reclassified" Now what makes a pathology a pathology is a lack of distress experienced by the afflicted. That is to say a psychopath does not believe they are a psychopath, therefore feels no distress about their "condition"

In a shocking display of double speak, the writers of the DSM determined that because homosexuals didnt report being "afflicted" as a result of their same sex attraction, it in fact was not a pathology, but a "preference" which it is STILL classified as today. You read that correctly, the same reason a psycho is a psycho and therefore mentally ill, is the same reason a homosexual is NOT mentally ill. Pretty amazing isn't it?

Before they could mainstream homosexuality they couldnt have that nasty "mental illness" tag hanging over their heads now could they. So a few million lobbyist dollars later(it was not a medical retraction, but a cave in to social pressure) the path was clear to mainstream homosexuality. Remember freddy mercury going public with his AIDS, and the "AIDS MANIA" of the 80's?? The fastest path to getting the public to accept a group is to generate sympathy for them. So they pushed the hell out of the aids being a primarily disease of the gay talking point to drum up support for the cause.

You neednt look hard to see the subsequent steps taken in the 90's. Gay comic book characters, tv show characters, the pride parade. Than in the early milennium "GLEE"(on fox) was literally the last step in mainstream acceptance of this "lifetsyle"

So the logical question is "why"?

1) The original wave of mk/sra victims were of age of rememberance, and when they began telling their tales the perpetraitors would be looked upon less harshly is they werent "mentally ill" as well, though this is admittedly minor since the experiments and abuse are apalling non the less.

2) Remember the vast majority of the 1% partake in sodomy as a means of "magick" thus they wanted it destigmatized to find WILLING participants.

3) Before people agree to shed their humanity and accept cyber implants, they have to see themselves as something less than human, so they need to blur gender lines before they can eradicate gender entirely. hence this nonsense about "gender fludiity" and gender being a choice as opposed to a designation you are born with.

4) Homosexuality was the first step in this progression, homsexuality-transgender-pedophile-agendered-and finally cyborg(human with predominantly robotic parts).

How does this fit in with feminism? It seems the "elite" men really dislike women and almost want to turn them into men while encouraging sexual promiscuity.  It seems like this all happened at the same time.

it's not just about turning women into men, but men into women, see: glitter beards, manscaping, how men are portrayed on sitcoms, the demonization of all masculine traits.. its about role reversal than elimination. Our souls dont have a gender, they have a tendency your energy signature is both masculine and feminine but almost always more one than another, you determined your gender pre incarnation to facilitiate certain spiritual lessons you needed to learn.

This gender fluid nonsense makes that impossible. And it actually happened slowly, it started with the womens rights movement in the 70's convincing women that working was emowering when all it was doing was getting 51% of the population who previously had not been paying taxes to start paying up, and to disintegrate the family unit to increase reliance upon the government.

Most Native American cultures honored and accepted what they called the; "Two-Spirit" the feminine energy incarnated in a males physical body as in the case of the Berdache.

There is nothing wrong with honoring the feminine in men, balance of energies is essential, however native american shaman embracing feminine energy is a far cry from 3 year old takign hormone replacement medication and having life altering surgery at 14.

>muh science, gay gene, gay brains
Re: what science "knows" a few years ago  science "knew" the higgs boson was the smallest particle in existence, now they know that is wrong, before that the quark, before that, the atom, my point is scienes knowledge in genetics is still quite primitive shit they still think 96% of our dna is “junk"
  • IP logged

  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 158
  • Karma: +9/-0
Re: I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#11: May 05, 2020, 09:44:14 PM
Move over JQ, here comes the FQ. This is the second third rail. My question is, other than outliers, will women ever acknowledge this?
  • IP logged
« Last Edit: May 05, 2020, 09:48:58 PM by Grass is Green »
Welcome to the Free Thought Movement.

M
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 105
  • Karma: +2/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#12: May 05, 2020, 11:49:00 PM
No I don't think so. Even the red pilled women I've met refuse to look inward. A large portion of men will need to stand up to help reset things (or the usual violence reset -mass war and casualties).
  • IP logged

s
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 112
  • Karma: +1/-0
I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#13: May 06, 2020, 05:58:12 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No I don't think so. Even the red pilled women I've met refuse to look inward. A large portion of men will need to stand up to help reset things (or the usual violence reset -mass war and casualties).
Suffragettes 1890as feminists starting point and solid victory. Aristophanes Lysistrate opined when everything is said and done a mans pleasure is in a womans hand you get in a tiff with a babe and lose -you lose big-however even if you win you're still a schmuck lol woman who  put man in Dog house ,soon find him in Cat House
Feminists and their limp wristed  Self hating weak kneed Male yes men have gamed the system there is hope Ngram and feminazis google and its feminism is Cancer and if Charlie Brown ever wises up he will aim that kick at Lucys posterior
  • IP logged

i

iknownothing

I'm sure this will be an unpopular topic...
#14: May 06, 2020, 07:42:38 AM
All of the "red pilled women" I have found don't really care, they just get free attention from men doing it. By appearing to be on "their side" these men give them attention and money but no criticism.

An example: It didn't take long 'till "support me via paypal" got dropped into her videos: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

  • IP logged

 
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk