Skip to main content

Author Topic: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)

W
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#315: August 27, 2020, 05:21:10 AM
Have you seen this yet?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

And where did you find #'d list with the moon pic?
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1162
  • Karma: +19/-0
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#316: August 27, 2020, 11:18:00 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Have you seen this yet?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

And where did you find #'d list with the moon pic?

What exactly are we supposed to be seeing on that Twitter page
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1299
  • Karma: +26/-2
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#317: September 01, 2020, 01:18:59 PM
I want to mention something in relation to Marilyn Manson's 'Beautiful People' song.

The music video depicts Manson and his gang with straight jackets and other torture and related attire. Stuff you'd normally see in a horror movie. It shows them doing what ever it is that they do among the masses and not being seen as strange but even cool.
The vibes and implication here is similar to Lovecraft's 'Arkham' and the 'Arkham' in the Batman universe. That society (at least our current one) is really a multi layered prison and torture chamber for everyone who isn't the ones at the top enjoying the view.

The people who think they are 'sane' are actually 'insane' and the proof of this is their ability to remain in such a society and not see anything wrong with it, much less do something about said wrongs. Anyone who sees through their cognitive dissonance and tries to revolt in small numbers will be put down, labeled mental and be dealt with. Depending on the person, they may be sent to wizard prisons (psych wards).

How likely is it that Lovecraft and the people behind Batman both knew about this 'Arkham' city and mental asylum? It's either they tapped into something or the information regarding such was shared with them (Batman creators) to disclose in their 'fiction'.
Maybe the creators of Batman read Lovecraft? Even if that was the case, you still have to wonder what inspired them to name if 'Arkham' after Lovecraft's (implying that's how it happened).

Also the original cult of Saturn threads on /x/ referenced Batman and mental asylums a lot.
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1299
  • Karma: +26/-2
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#318: September 04, 2020, 10:30:50 PM
The desire to control every aspect of the lives of everything and everyone is a negative aspect of Saturn. A modern example of this invasion of privacy is the continuous growth of surveillance equipment and digital means of tracking people and all they do.

Even if those digital, machine things did not exist you would still be 'tracked' by a much higher force than anyone on Earth is. That's simply how things are. You can't do something and not leave your mark there. The difference between the 'natural tracking' and 'digital/technological tracking' is that one is overseen by a very 'neutral', natural force that simply logs everything that happens (think the Akashic records) while the other is owned and controlled by a man (men) and a corporation that supplies the means to do so at its most ostensible layer.

Think about what a 'bar code' is. A few lines and numbers in a specific sequence. Minus the black bars its just a unique sequence of numbers assigned to each individual item/object/person that is tagged with one. This 'unique sequence of numbers' can also be seen in Pi and Phi and on a more meta layer an individuals energy signature.
The numbers exist for man to interpret and perceive the energy and its many unique manifestations all around us. When man forgets why the numbers exist and the original energy it describes then unnatural means and technology arise in order to track and label everything.

Crowley was able to assign a series of numbers to energies and entities (even concepts and ideas) that he observed and interacted with. While I have yet to see anyone explain how he was able to do this, my (other) point is that he was able to do this and its a more natural means of labeling energy if you lack the ability to sense what it is without using any other 'system' (numbers, names etc).
Clones (think Star Wars and Hitman) are stereotypically known for having 'numbers' and not 'names' (titles). If both numbers and names describe certain energies and the roles they play then what is the difference between them? Why would people prefer to be called a 'name' with letters and not numbers instead?

Where did this feeling of numbers being artificial, inhumane and lacking in feeling and compassion originate from?

Tracking things using digital numbers and codes is the low key version of the natural, universe wide means of tracking all energy and its many unique manifestations as it 'moves' 'in' Creator.
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1299
  • Karma: +26/-2
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#319: September 06, 2020, 03:01:45 PM
This is magic. How else would you call the practice of manipulating light? This is said to be a way of achieving "ultra-secure online communications" that no one can "hack". Would be a real shame if someone could 'read' and manipulate light without a machine.

This is also interesting because it hints at how light is the ultimate carrier of information.
Quote
"So far physicists have developed a form of secure encryption, known as quantum key distribution, in which particles of light, called photons, are transmitted to carry information."

'Unhackable' internet moves a step closer after 'game-changing' quantum breakthrough paves way for safer online communication
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


The suggestion and move to the benefits of being underground continues. When the masses finally decides to go down there, who will they meet?
Quote
"A scanning tunneling microscope shows a quantum bit from a phosphorus atom precisely positioned in silicon. Scientists have discovered how to make the qubits 'talk to one another"

Scientists use 'Lucifer' (phosphorus) to make 'qubits' "talk to one another".

Future quantum computers may have to be built UNDERGROUND to protect them from cosmic rays and other natural radiation that can hinder their performance, study claims
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/]u]
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1299
  • Karma: +26/-2
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#320: September 10, 2020, 11:52:41 AM
Resembles a tree with roots doesn't it?

  • IP logged

T
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +0/-0
Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#321: September 13, 2020, 02:45:35 AM
The text begins with "'You need to listen to me' it said on the front" instead of a phrase like "'You need to read this' it stated on the front". So as I read the post I heard a girl's voice.

There's no one speaking.

I imagined Faith's voice. I imagined Faith. Everyone did.
  • IP logged

N
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1162
  • Karma: +19/-0
Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#322: September 13, 2020, 02:58:27 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The text begins with "'You need to listen to me' it said on the front" instead of a phrase like "'You need to read this' it stated on the front". So as I read the post I heard a girl's voice.

There's no one speaking.

I imagined Faith's voice. I imagined Faith. Everyone did.

Yes but where are you going
  • IP logged

y
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#323: September 14, 2020, 12:56:33 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"Cogito, ergo sum", also known as "I think, therefore I am". In Latin, when you refer to yourself as 'I", you say 'ego'.

"I am" what though? If there is no such thing as separation but only the illusion of it, then wouldn't it appear as if thinking that "I am" is feeding the ego, a parasite in the mind that encourages the illusion of separation?

Is saying "I think, therefore I am" showing that what 'you' actually are is not in control of the wheel, but your ego instead?

The ego is a parasite in the mind. The mind is the seat of the soul. We are a 'soul', we don't 'possess' one. How did our 'egos' come to be if we all inherently understand the interconnections of everything before we are programmed to believe otherwise?

"I am that I am". . . what does it mean?

Popeye - I Yam What I Yam & Dats What I Yam!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I used to interpret this saying in my mind as something like 'I can think, therefore I exist' but recently I've thought of that saying in relation to manifestation, 'I think therefore I am' or 'I am that I am' - most important rule of manifestation is to know/feel that you already possess what you desire, no?

For example 'I think that I am at peace, therefore I am at peace'

Would like to know what you think. Am I thinking about this too simply?
 
  • IP logged

  • *****
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • Posts: 263
  • Karma: +15/-0
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#324: September 14, 2020, 01:29:01 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"Cogito, ergo sum", also known as "I think, therefore I am". In Latin, when you refer to yourself as 'I", you say 'ego'.

"I am" what though? If there is no such thing as separation but only the illusion of it, then wouldn't it appear as if thinking that "I am" is feeding the ego, a parasite in the mind that encourages the illusion of separation?

Is saying "I think, therefore I am" showing that what 'you' actually are is not in control of the wheel, but your ego instead?

The ego is a parasite in the mind. The mind is the seat of the soul. We are a 'soul', we don't 'possess' one. How did our 'egos' come to be if we all inherently understand the interconnections of everything before we are programmed to believe otherwise?

"I am that I am". . . what does it mean?

Popeye - I Yam What I Yam & Dats What I Yam!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I used to interpret this saying in my mind as something like 'I can think, therefore I exist' but recently I've thought of that saying in relation to manifestation, 'I think therefore I am' or 'I am that I am' - most important rule of manifestation is to know/feel that you already possess what you desire, no?

For example 'I think that I am at peace, therefore I am at peace'

Would like to know what you think. Am I thinking about this too simply?


The difference between think and feel is vast, let alone between those and know.
  • IP logged
Welcome to the Free Thought Movement.

y
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#325: September 14, 2020, 01:48:04 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"Cogito, ergo sum", also known as "I think, therefore I am". In Latin, when you refer to yourself as 'I", you say 'ego'.

"I am" what though? If there is no such thing as separation but only the illusion of it, then wouldn't it appear as if thinking that "I am" is feeding the ego, a parasite in the mind that encourages the illusion of separation?

Is saying "I think, therefore I am" showing that what 'you' actually are is not in control of the wheel, but your ego instead?

The ego is a parasite in the mind. The mind is the seat of the soul. We are a 'soul', we don't 'possess' one. How did our 'egos' come to be if we all inherently understand the interconnections of everything before we are programmed to believe otherwise?

"I am that I am". . . what does it mean?

Popeye - I Yam What I Yam & Dats What I Yam!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I used to interpret this saying in my mind as something like 'I can think, therefore I exist' but recently I've thought of that saying in relation to manifestation, 'I think therefore I am' or 'I am that I am' - most important rule of manifestation is to know/feel that you already possess what you desire, no?

For example 'I think that I am at peace, therefore I am at peace'

Would like to know what you think. Am I thinking about this too simply?


The difference between think and feel is vast, let alone between those and know.


Of course, but is thought not some sort of precursor to feeling/emotions and by way, a path to knowing? Or is it at least related in some way?
I agree that simply thinking 'I' is feeding your ego, but I thought of that saying as a path to manifestation, it's such a simple saying yet it could be interpreted in so many different ways.
If the purpose is to dissolve the ego, wouldn't it be useful to transfer thoughts such as this into emotion/feeling and then knowing? And if separation is only an illusion, then how is the ego to be dissolved? Wouldn't it mean to be a part of you?
I think ego came to fruition by way of language? If we didn't have language, would the concept of 'ego' exist?
Interesting to think about, thanks for your reply :)
  • IP logged

T
  • *****
  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 1299
  • Karma: +26/-2
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#326: September 14, 2020, 02:16:16 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"Cogito, ergo sum", also known as "I think, therefore I am". In Latin, when you refer to yourself as 'I", you say 'ego'.

"I am" what though? If there is no such thing as separation but only the illusion of it, then wouldn't it appear as if thinking that "I am" is feeding the ego, a parasite in the mind that encourages the illusion of separation?

Is saying "I think, therefore I am" showing that what 'you' actually are is not in control of the wheel, but your ego instead?

The ego is a parasite in the mind. The mind is the seat of the soul. We are a 'soul', we don't 'possess' one. How did our 'egos' come to be if we all inherently understand the interconnections of everything before we are programmed to believe otherwise?

"I am that I am". . . what does it mean?

Popeye - I Yam What I Yam & Dats What I Yam!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I used to interpret this saying in my mind as something like 'I can think, therefore I exist' but recently I've thought of that saying in relation to manifestation, 'I think therefore I am' or 'I am that I am' - most important rule of manifestation is to know/feel that you already possess what you desire, no?

For example 'I think that I am at peace, therefore I am at peace'

Would like to know what you think. Am I thinking about this too simply?


The difference between think and feel is vast, let alone between those and know.

And certainty is not 'think(ing)', 'feeling' or 'knowing'.
  • IP logged

y
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#327: September 14, 2020, 02:47:28 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"Cogito, ergo sum", also known as "I think, therefore I am". In Latin, when you refer to yourself as 'I", you say 'ego'.

"I am" what though? If there is no such thing as separation but only the illusion of it, then wouldn't it appear as if thinking that "I am" is feeding the ego, a parasite in the mind that encourages the illusion of separation?

Is saying "I think, therefore I am" showing that what 'you' actually are is not in control of the wheel, but your ego instead?

The ego is a parasite in the mind. The mind is the seat of the soul. We are a 'soul', we don't 'possess' one. How did our 'egos' come to be if we all inherently understand the interconnections of everything before we are programmed to believe otherwise?

"I am that I am". . . what does it mean?

Popeye - I Yam What I Yam & Dats What I Yam!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I used to interpret this saying in my mind as something like 'I can think, therefore I exist' but recently I've thought of that saying in relation to manifestation, 'I think therefore I am' or 'I am that I am' - most important rule of manifestation is to know/feel that you already possess what you desire, no?

For example 'I think that I am at peace, therefore I am at peace'

Would like to know what you think. Am I thinking about this too simply?


The difference between think and feel is vast, let alone between those and know.

And certainty is not 'think(ing)', 'feeling' or 'knowing'.

Are they not, on the same spectrum of sorts? Or rather thinking, feeling, and knowing leads to certainty in ones mind? Isn't certainty simply knowing with strong conviction?
  • IP logged

T
  • *
  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +0/-0
Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#328: September 14, 2020, 03:00:53 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The text begins with "'You need to listen to me' it said on the front" instead of a phrase like "'You need to read this' it stated on the front". So as I read the post I heard a girl's voice.

There's no one speaking.

I imagined Faith's voice. I imagined Faith. Everyone did.

Yes but where are you going

The space between worlds. The voice appeared from silence. So if I silence myself I should reach it.
  • IP logged

Z
  • ***
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 138
  • Karma: +7/-0
Key#1(and a challenge to those with eyes to see)
#329: September 15, 2020, 05:56:54 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

x marks the spot?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
  • IP logged

 
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk