Is anyone here familiar with the book "The Curse of Canaan" by Eustace Mullins?
I'm currently reading it and finding it to be quite intriguing.
The general argument is as follows:
Most white humans are either descended from two lines of posterity. Either Shem, Noah's son, or Canaan, the son of Ham (another of Noah's sons).
The line of Shem is generally a freedom-loving, hard-working, world improving line of genetics. They can often be identified as being larger, often blue-eyed, and fiercely independent.
The line of Canaan are smaller, they are drawn to evil practices. They are fiercely defensive of their secret pact amongst themselves. Their entire goal in life is to kill, steal from, enslave and manipulate the children of Shem.
The children of Shem are the true "Semites". ("Semite" comes from "children of Shem")
Therefore the children of Canaan are the true "Anti-Semites".
The children of Canaan became the way they are through the "Nephilim" interbreeding in their lines. The Nephilim are non-human participants in this earth life, who, without the permission of the "creator" (little "c") inserted their genetics into the lines of mankind through breeding.
This genetic insertion gave their family lines the desires and urges that they have.
This battle between the children of Shem and the children of Canaan has been going on for this entire rendition of the earth.
The "Israelites" were children of Shem. The Canaanites were the children of the Nephilim.
The creator (little "c") oft told the children of Shem to destroy the Canaanites completely, and to NEVER marry or breed with them. It was warned that if by doing so eventually the children of Canaan would take control over the children of Shem and "they would lend to thee, but you will not lend to them..." (or something like that).
The children of Shem often beat the children of Canaan in battles and wars (children of Shem are more intelligent, better warriors, have more courage) but they never fully wiped them out.
Eventually, the lines of the children of Canaan and the children of Shem braided together (for example, the Pharisees were a line of "Cannan" living amongst the ancient children of Shem). Though for the most part they maintained separation.
The line of Canaan was always attracted to becoming "merchants" and creating "monopolies" on products and services.
They were the people of the land of Carthage (Phonecians). They were the worshipers of the God "Moloch" and the ones that would sacrifice their children in fires. They were also the ones who would worship statues and images via sexual behaviors in "groves".
They were destroyed in Carthage by Rome.
But they didn't die out. Instead, they moved into the societies of the children of Shem.
Though they also created their own break off societies when they had the chance. For example, the city of Venice and the Venitian "Black Nobility" were of the house of Canaan.
They intermarried with the royal families of Europe, and eventually polluted those bloodlines completely.
They ran scams every chance they got.
They started the secret societies (freemasonry, Illuminati) as ways to attract the power-hungry of the children of Shem and to use them for the gathering of control and enrichment of the Canaanites.
They started the federal reserve.
And on and on and on.
In short, the children of Canaan often hide amount the jewish bloodlines. And their entire focus is on keeping their secret hidden. They twist everything around, even the phrase "anti-semite"is a twisting of real truth, as canaanites are not actually "semitic" according to the real use of the word. But the people who they call "anti-semites" actually are semitic.
I'm finding this all very interesting.
It's especially interesting that Amazon is no longer allowing the book to be sold.
You are not allowed to view links.
(I have since found other copies on Amazon that a person can purchase).
Here is a copy of the PDF if anyone is interested.
You are not allowed to view links.
I also find it VERY interesting that "New Canaan" Connecticut is one of the wealthiest cities in all of America. Eustice Mullins claims that the Canaanites like to name cities and lands with "New" in front of them as a symbol of their association with it. It's like an easter egg to the Canaanites.
New Mexico is pretty damn corrupt as far as states go. I'm wondering if it isn't also associated with the Canaanites.
I'm just curious to hear if anyone else is familair with this. I'd love to hear anyone's opinion. I've personally found it to be quite interesting.